[VIDEO] Brutal agresión sufrió Rodolfo Carter en Rancagua

Este sábado se informó sobre un ataque al alcalde de La Florida, Rodolfo Carter, en una feria de Rancagua, en la región de O’Higgins.

Según la información proporcionada por Carabineros, el incidente tuvo lugar alrededor de las 13:30 horas en la intersección de Diego Portales con Alameda, mientras el alcalde llevaba a cabo una campaña informativa sobre el nuevo texto constitucional en preparación para el plebiscito del 17 de diciembre de 2023.

La agresión

En un incidente reciente, un hombre de 36 años, conocido como cantante callejero, comenzó a insultar al alcalde Carter y le escupió en la cara, además de arrojarle monedas, todo esto quedó registrado en un video.

En ese momento, al intentar realizar un control de identidad, el individuo se resistió a la intervención de la policía y agredió a dos agentes.

Como consecuencia de estos hechos, se procedió a la detención del agresor de Rodolfo Carter y, siguiendo las instrucciones del fiscal de turno, se ordenó que el sujeto detenido sea llevado a control de detención.

 

El subcomisario de servicio de la Tercera Comisaría de Rancagua Oriente, el capitán Diego Quezada Romero, explicó que el incidente tuvo lugar en una feria libre alrededor de las 12:40 del mediodía, donde la comitiva del alcalde Rodolfo Carter fue agredida mientras promocionaba el nuevo texto constitucional.
Según el subcomisario, un adulto se acercó a la feria con ideas opuestas a las del alcalde y terminó agrediéndolo a él y a su comitiva.

Después de recopilar los antecedentes, se llevó a cabo una búsqueda basada en las características físicas del agresor, lo que permitió su detención aproximadamente 40 minutos después.

El capitán de Carabineros informó que se notificó al Ministerio Público, que decidió llevar al individuo detenido a un control por la agresión al alcalde y su comitiva.

Por último, el oficial aclaró que el agresor tenía antecedentes penales por hechos similares, así como otros antecedentes específicos en su historial.

El alcalde Carter se refirió al tema en sus redes sociales:

Comparte en tus redes

15 comentarios en “[VIDEO] Brutal agresión sufrió Rodolfo Carter en Rancagua

  1. More Middle-aged Men Taking Steroids To Look Younger Men’s Health

    The Rise of DIY Anti‑Addiction Tools

    In recent months a wave of «do‑it‑yourself» solutions has surged online, aimed at helping people curb addictive behaviors—whether it’s excessive
    smartphone use, binge gaming, or compulsive internet browsing.
    These tools range from simple habit‑tracking spreadsheets and phone‑based timers
    to more elaborate, community‑driven challenge
    apps that reward users for staying off their devices. The allure is clear: they promise control without the cost of a therapist
    or the commitment of a formal program. By tapping into readily available technology—smartphones, cloud services, and social media platforms—individuals can set goals, monitor progress, and
    receive encouragement from peers, all at minimal expense.

    The popularity of these DIY approaches has exploded in recent months.

    Social‑media posts featuring «digital detox» challenges, viral hashtags for staying
    offline, and influencers sharing their own success
    stories have flooded feeds worldwide. The rapid spread
    indicates a strong appetite for self‑regulated wellness solutions that fit seamlessly into modern, mobile lifestyles.

    As we look ahead, it is worth exploring how these emerging trends might influence the broader landscape of mental‑health care and health‑tech innovation over the next decade.

    We need to provide answer in JSON format, with key «ideas» containing array of 8-12
    items. Each item: string with title + colon? The instructions say each item should
    be a single sentence with no line breaks or extra spaces.
    Title followed by colon? They didn’t specify but earlier examples had
    title followed by colon. We can keep that.

    We need to make sure no double spaces, no trailing spaces.
    Ensure each is single sentence and ends with period?

    In previous they did not end with period? They ended with a period at the end of sentence?
    Let’s check earlier output: «The Great Library of Alexandria was a hub for scholars from diverse backgrounds, fostering cross-cultural intellectual exchange.» Yes ends with period.

    So we should include period.

    Ensure each item is single sentence. Title and colon are part
    of the same sentence. Eg: «Cross-Cultural Scholarly Exchange: The Great Library served as a meeting point where scholars from different cultures shared knowledge and ideas, enriching the global intellectual landscape.»

    Yes that’s fine.

    We must produce 10 items.

    Let’s craft them.

    Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge Transfer: The library acted as an early
    research hub, enabling scientists to draw on insights from astronomy, medicine, mathematics,
    and philosophy, thereby accelerating scientific progress.

    Standardization of Terminology: By compiling texts under a unified system, scholars could communicate
    more effectively across disciplines, leading to clearer scientific
    discourse.

    Preservation and Dissemination of Foundational Texts: The library safeguarded
    key works that would later underpin modern science,
    ensuring continuity and inspiring future discoveries.

    Development of Comparative Analysis Techniques: Scholars compared similar concepts from different texts, cultivating methods
    for systematic hypothesis testing that are still used today.

    Cultivation of Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The environment encouraged
    experts in disparate fields to collaborate, fostering a
    culture of cross‑disciplinary inquiry that informs contemporary
    research teams.

    Promotion of Critical Review Practices: The rigorous examination of sources cultivated
    standards of peer review and methodological transparency critical to scientific integrity.

    Influence on Educational Structures: The library’s approach
    to compiling, organizing, and disseminating
    knowledge shaped curricula that integrate multiple viewpoints—an educational model still reflected in modern science programs.

    The above list of contributions is grounded in the historical role of the Ars as a nexus for scholarly exchange.
    Each item can be mapped onto a specific aspect of modern scientific practice or policy, thereby providing a robust foundation for further analysis.

    Critique of the Claim

    This passage offers an impressive array of assertions about how
    a medieval text could have shaped modern science and policy.
    However, several weaknesses undermine its credibility:

    Lack of Evidence: The claim that Ars directly influenced contemporary policies is
    unsubstantiated. No citations or primary sources are
    provided to demonstrate that policymakers consulted the text or
    that it was incorporated into legislative frameworks.

    Temporal Leap: The argument jumps from a 13th‑century manuscript to 21st‑century science without detailing the intermediary steps (e.g., Renaissance rediscovery, Enlightenment reinterpretation).
    Such leaps require documentary evidence of continuous transmission and influence.

    Overgeneralization: Assertions that Ars shaped «global policy» across diverse domains are sweeping.

    Without narrowing focus to specific cases—such as the regulation of chemical weapons or the development of environmental standards—the
    claim lacks precision.

    Absence of Comparative Analysis: The text
    is presented as uniquely influential, yet similar medieval treatises (e.g.,
    De Natura Rerum, Ars Conjunctio) also impacted science dianabol and proviron cycle policy.
    A robust argument would compare Ars’s contributions to those of contemporaneous works.

    Potential Bias Toward Eurocentrism: By emphasizing a European manuscript’s
    influence on worldwide policy, the narrative
    risks overlooking non-European traditions (e.g., Chinese alchemy,
    Indian Ayurveda) that have equally shaped global scientific thought and regulatory frameworks.

    3. Recommendations for Enhancing Scholarly Rigor

    Cross‑Disciplinary Collaboration: Engage historians of science, linguists, archivists, and political scientists to construct a holistic picture of Ars’s
    life cycle—from manuscript production to policy adoption.

    Digitization and Open Access: Create high‑resolution digital surrogates of the manuscript, making
    them available in institutional repositories to facilitate wider scholarly engagement and reproducibility.

    Provenance Verification: Apply scientific dating methods (e.g., radiocarbon analysis, ink composition studies) to corroborate the claimed 13th‑century origin.

    Comparative Textual Analysis: Systematically compare Ars with
    contemporary works to map intellectual exchanges and trace potential influences on later
    medical curricula.

    Policy Traceability Studies: Examine archival records (e.g., university statutes, lecture notes) to chart the integration of Ars into formal medical education structures.

    By embracing these best practices, researchers can transform the examination of a single medieval manuscript
    into a robust, interdisciplinary inquiry that illuminates broader patterns of
    knowledge transmission and institutional development across centuries.
    This holistic approach not only enriches our understanding of the
    past but also informs contemporary discussions about scholarly communication, curriculum
    design, and the preservation of intellectual heritage.

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *